2 Comments
-
I think this just drives more companies to embrace personal liable and provide only a stipend to offset mobile expense based on role. We’re targeting to reduce our corporate liable deployment over the next 2-3 years as mobile data and device churn are near impossible to keep up with.
Let employees make decisions based on what works for them and how “connected” they wish to be.
There are core values in enabling a mobile workforce (and have full oversight) but the budget number is growing yearly.
0
0-
The key is that the stipend needs to be less than the enterprise cost of deployment. That’s a balance that companies often misjudge because they don’t measure the total cost of ownership for BYOD correctly: reimbursement, cost of reimbursement processes, support, and a possible lost discount on enterprise networking and telecom services. Typically, an appropriate BYOD stipend that is cost-neutral compared to well-managed enterprise spend would be $20-$40 per month less than the actual individual bill depending on the support and overall corporate carrier spend involved.
0
0
-
Share Everything: Will This Crush Your Enterprise Mobility Budget?
On June 28th, Verizon launched the Share Everything plan, which provided a pool of shared data for multiple users and multiple devices. AT&T quickly responded with its own set of Mobile Share data plans that are scheduled to be launched on August 23rd. These plans represent a fundamental shift in the cost structure of mobility and have been driven by two trends in enterprise mobility and mobile infrastructure.
So, what is actually happening here? Service providers can’t simply move to a device-based or user-based billing plan yet because they can’t afford to support the data bandwidth yet. But at the same time, they realize that future opportunities in increasing the average revenue per user are dependent on the proliferation of mobile devices.
As a result, Verizon and AT&T have come up with these clunky Mobile Share Everything plans that include some amount of data, types of devices, and numbers of devices. From a wireless expense management perspective, the most important change here is that companies will have to start thinking about the types of devices associated with their enterprise mobility deployments to control operational expenses. This is an evolutionary change from the carrier perspective from a usage-based billing model to a model that takes hardware (including end user preferences for specific types of hardware) into account in charging for services.
As carriers increase their bandwidth infrastructure, the raw cost of data will have a similar lifecycle to landline long distance over the next several years, where the cost per unit reduces over time and finally is tossed into an unlimited monthly plan. To compensate, the carriers have made this shift towards a device-specific and user-specific billing model where end user hardware preferences and behaviors will play an increasingly large role in how companies are charged. This trend will create challenges for mobility departments seeking to forecast their operational budgets over the next couple of years, regardless of whether this budget is based on corporate-liable models, reimbursement of personal devices, or a hybrid COPE approach. The designation of “smartphone” versus “mobile phone” already seems arbitrary enough, but what happens when the newest iPhone or Galaxy device suddenly gets an extra $10/month surcharge or each sensor associated with an M2M deployment gets charged?
As mobility managers both renegotiate their contracts and prepare their budget projections over the next couple of years, they have to consider this fundamental change in mobility billing as it is phased into their environments, as it has the potential to radically change costs if companies simply accept these changes without prior visibility or planning. In preparing for 2013 budget and service provider planning, take the following steps: