Want more than just blog posts? Login or Sign up for a free acount and get research, videos, slide decks and more! Join the online social network for Enterprise Mobility.

Thoughts on Nokia Potentially Licensing Windows Phone 7: The Enterprise Mobility Perspective

As you have probably heard, there is a rumor going around the interweb that Nokia is in talks with Microsoft to license the Windows Phone 7 operating system.  As can be expected, people are now weighing in on the pros and cons of such a move.  As you might recall, I suggested this move the day that Nokia announced that Elop would be running things in Espoo moving forward.  I maintain what I said then.  Nokia should absolutely license Windows Phone 7.

Nokia, as we all know, makes some pretty remarkable hardware, but has found new and innovative ways of dropping the ball when it comes to the software.  You know there have to be teams in Espoo that are scratching their heads, trying to figure out what the software strategy should be for the fabled company.  Let me offer three suggestions:

  • Relegate Symbian to compete with Bada – meaning for “high end feature phones” (whatever that means)
  • License Windows Phone 7 as the carriers have already agreed to support it
  • If you MUST insist on having your own proprietary OS, then double down on MeeGo

Windows Phone 7 will allow you to invest so much less time on the software side.  I know I sound like a walking advertisement for our friends in Redmond, but this just makes good business sense in my opinion.  By licensing WP7, Nokia would for all intents and purposes be outsourcing a big portion of the software development time line.  They could thus focus on what they do well…and that’s some pretty great hardware.

Now, the enterprise part.  Microsoft, while not always having the clearest strategies, has certainly understood the enterprise.  If that’s not the core of their DNA, then I don’t know what is.  By licensing WP7, Nokia instantly gets enterprise class devices…and also a place at the US carrier table…something it has been sorely lacking for some time now.

Mobility management – that is no longer Nokia’s problem. This too gets punted to Microsoft because they are the ones who will be making the OS updates.  The marketing argument/justification for the enterprise readiness (or lack thereof) will be something where Nokia can just point the finger at Redmond.  I don’t know about you, but I just can’t imagine Microsoft dropping THAT ball when it comes to its new mobile OS.  Additionally, mobility management companies aren’t ready yet to support MeeGo, but they are either announcing or planning on announcing (I would assume) support for the platform.  For now, it’s ActiveSync, but it’s there at least.

So go on Mr. Elop, go call up Ballmer (I assume you still have his mobile phone number) and cut a deal with him so your engineers can get cracking on some amazing looking devices.

4 Comments

  1. Posted December 23, 2010 at 09:33 | Permalink

    Here’s a holiday rhyme for ya:

    The enterprise and MeeGo?
    I just don’t think so!

    Here are my somewhat detailed thoughts on Nokia & Microsoft:

    Nokia, the Convention of Usual Suspects, and Charles Dickens – http://bit.ly/apKM1j

    Tony
    http://www.mobilemasterscommunity.com

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Posted December 26, 2010 at 12:16 | Permalink

    Philippe,

    This is on target. In my universe Nokia has earned a position of irrelevance. I always marvel at vendors who take the “Novell trajectory” due to lack of effective innovation.

    Also, having dealt recently with a Phone 7 device, I think the active widgets on device are a very compelling UI change. Who would of known that Microsoft could still innovate? This is not snarky on my part, it is honest surprise! We’ll see how the Apps ecosystem and consumer penetration develops over time as the new make-break for devices implies you cannot just be an Enterprise device as the market is too small to fuel wide scale innovation. My opinion.

    Nokia, listen! Please try to discard the NIH approach.

    ~Art

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Posted December 27, 2010 at 16:56 | Permalink

      Art – So what should Nokia focus on? WP7 or Android? Which one do you think they would have more success with?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Posted December 27, 2010 at 19:21 | Permalink

        If I were in Nokia’s shoes, I would strategically commit to WP7. Innovate form factors, UI’s, Management, OAP, etc with Microsoft as I think that Nokia has complementary knowledge that Microsoft does not. Much like HTC did amazing things with it’s Sense UI and Exchange client to elevate Android to iPhone level, Nokia+Microsoft could be powerful.

        On potential success, I cannot know what would be better direction. The Android market is crowded with strong competition and some exceptionally good devices. WP7 is emergent so it gives Nokia an opportunity to capture new customers who never heard of them and recover some folks who moved to other platforms. Nokia needs to establish itself in the consumer market with a smartphone play as that volume is necessary to survive. This might also lead to Nokia delivering MS Pad computers in future. Who knows?

        There may a tactical play for Nokia to support Android so they can satisfy operator RFP’s around Android. Maybe they will do that also with a looser commitment to Google.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

One Trackback

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Philippe Winthrop. Philippe Winthrop said: Thoughts on Nokia Potentially Licensing Windows Phone 7: The Enterprise Mobility Perspective http://t.co/A0RxCKv via @the_emf_dot_org [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.