Want more than just blog posts? Login or Sign up for a free acount and get research, videos, slide decks and more! Join the online social network for Enterprise Mobility.

Enterprise Mobility: It’s The Apps, Stupid

Sorry to have what could appear as a potentially offensive title to today’s missive, but I am solely trying to paraphrase the famous quote attributed to Democratic political strategist James Carville during the 1992 Clinton presidential campaign.  I think of this phrase when I read an article on eWeek today about the “enterprise readiness” of Windows Phone 7.  The link I provided is the 2nd half of the article, dubbed “Windows Phone 7 Needs to Gain Enterprises’ Trust.” One question….one word even.  Really?

What does that statement even mean anymore?  What is “the enterprise?” I know that the author means the IT department’s blessing, but isn’t that so 2007/2008?  I will argue that enterprise trust has for better or for worse gone out the window – at least in the case of mobility.  How so?  The continued onslaught of individually liable devices.  Now we all know how strongly I feel about the need for a mobile platform to be enterprise friendly in the context of allowing the IT department to have visibility, command and control of a device, but that is a completely different question than general enterprise readiness.

I’ll admit that I have had to swallow a bitter pill lately as I have been rethinking my views on mobile platforms.  In the ITSM world that we should be living in – the world where the IT department is not a roadblock but instead, the catalyst for increasing business velocity, IT needs to provide to its workforce the tools they WANT in order to do their job as quickly, conveniently and effectively as possible.  By the way, isn’t that the promise of productivity?  Better, faster, easier?

So what makes a smartphone platform enterprise ready?  Back to Mr. Carvill.  It’s the apps, stupid.  Right now, with all the talk we have about mobile application proliferation, it’s still very much a PIM world out there.  Growth in other sectors WILL come, but I will not venture a guess as to when we will see the hockey stick.  I know it’s coming…heck, we might be in the middle of it now, but the bottom line is that today, we are still living in a PIM world. (By the way, Madonna is now stuck in my head)

Now, as far as the USER is concerned, enterprise readiness should be in my mind the ability to sync up to their work email, as well as having calendar and contact synchronization.  Some will say that being able to edit documents will also be important.  I for one am not a huge fan of editing documents on a tiny screen, but that’s me.  Microsoft is arguing that we will want to not only do that, but also collaborate with colleagues in that document editing, and as such, has provided SharePoint integration into Windows Phone 7.  That’s all well and good, but we’ll have to wait and see how attractive (and easy) that is to the workforce.  I won’t even begin to venture a guess on it.

Back to PIM – so if enterprise readiness is that a mobile platform can do OTA PIM, then they all are ready, right?  Not so fast.  Some platforms talk the talk, and others walk the walk.  I still find the ActiveSync implementation on iOS to be kludgey – I still have calendar sync issues, it’s hard to navigate through your mail when you have scores of folders, and there are no tasks.  Android’s worse.

Other apps such as CRM, SFA and supply chain management will also become increasingly important, but again, as long as the users find them useful.  The kitchen sink approach will NOT work, hence why I always suggested that companies go through a business process reengineering exercise as they think through the mobilization of a business application.

Now before you think I have completely fallen off the mobility management bandwagon, hold on.  IT also needs its own apps.  They need apps to manage the devices (see I wasn’t going to let go of my favorite topic THAT quickly).  They need apps to secure the devices.  They need apps to track the recurring costs of the devices and they need apps to manage the apps on the devices (that last one can get a little dizzying).  See where I’m going?

Just like mobility is both inwardly and outwardly facing for the company in terms of people interaction, I will argue that the applications must be both inwardly and outwardly facing.  Give an individual all the applications they need to be mobile, and give the IT department the applications it needs to manage the mobile initiatives.

That’s an enterprise ready mobile platform in my opinion.

8 Comments

  1. Posted October 19, 2010 at 12:44 | Permalink

    We’ve been doing app mgt for 3 years and applications, other than PIM, have not really taken off for smartphones. Maybe the reduction in spending slowed it down but I think more to your point, the form factor is not really ideal for most apps. But I’m seeing a new trend with the introduction of pads, a larger form factor is providing a better medium for delivering apps and companies are looking to invest again. What’s interesting is that those platforms are smartphone platforms which in turn could eventually drive attention back to smartphone applications.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Posted October 19, 2010 at 12:53 | Permalink

      Totally agreed Custie that much of the interest is for apps on smartphone OSs. It’s interesting then to hear Google say Android 2.2 is not meant for tablets and that they should be built for ChromeOS. What’s your take? Do you think that’s going to create even more fragmentation in the Google world?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Posted October 20, 2010 at 15:25 | Permalink

        I took the intention of Chrome OS as an internet, minimalist approach to browsing web based apps. Native controls will always give a more rich experience for those willing to spend the extra $. I have customers in several industries that a browser, even with webkits will not meet their needs. I haven’t yet seen that causing fragmentation as much as the mulitple versions of OSs are.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. Posted October 19, 2010 at 13:52 | Permalink

    All the enterprise really needs is the MEAP – then build HTML5 and/or native, and all the inward and outward, facing apps you want across all the necessary devices – you get full IT manageability of software and hardware, and all the back end connectivity is practically taken care of for you. My own latest blog post on Mobile Masters (at http://bit.ly/cFIc9k) takes a look at iPad/tablets and why they are going to be game changers on the enterprise app front…and why enterprises need to be ready. Much of the above applies!

    Tony

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Posted October 19, 2010 at 14:03 | Permalink

      Really great post Tony. This isn’t the 1st time I have said that the mobile workforce needs mobile OSs for their mobile tools. I still think typing on a big virtual keyboard stinks, but that’s another issue. That said, I firmly believe that sooner rather than later the laptop will be relegated to the role of a desktop replacement.

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

      • Posted October 19, 2010 at 15:23 | Permalink

        I haven’t pent any quality time trying to type on an iPad keyboard – yet – but I can tell you that despite the various problems I have with it my BB Torch would be completely unusable for me if it were not for the – dare I say it – real BB keyboard (its the Torch saving grace)…virtual keyboards and I just don’t get along on smart phone form factors. And yes, the laptop will face its own inevitable fate with history – though it still has tons of life left in it.

        Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. Posted October 22, 2010 at 08:48 | Permalink

    Philippe – You know the acronym “Mobile Application Management” – basically as you said, “the apps to manage the apps on the devices”. Turns out that beyond being dizzying, its a major security and compliance area for companies as they roll out both “employee owned” and “corporate owned devices”.

    The scenario we are seeing is that in-house developed apps, once deployed to an employee or contractor’s phone, may need to be deactivated for many reasons (including termination of the employee). And, the Draconian approach of “wiping the device” is not appropriate.

    Solutions that address MAM must provide an SDK that easily allows enterprise app developers to integrate authentication, authorization, and update checking right into their apps so that IT folks can manage these apps without impacting user personal information.

    We’re starting to see solutions like this emerge, including EASE (http://www.apperian.com/ease) but the policy, compliance, and security challenges are just starting to become evident.

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

    • Posted October 25, 2010 at 11:24 | Permalink

      Cimarron,

      There’s no question that governance risk and compliance will get augmented visibility as more and more business applications are being deployed on smartphones. It will of course be interesting to see how this plays out as mobile apps evolve from 100% native apps to HTML5 based applications that heavily leverage the cloud.

      Where/how will the data be federated?

      Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

5 Trackbacks

  1. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Philippe Winthrop, Andy Black. Andy Black said: RT @biz_mobility: Enterprise Mobility: It's The Apps, Stupid http://bit.ly/aRdbxs [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  2. [...] See the original post: Enterprise Mobility: It's The Apps, Stupid | The Enterprise … [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  3. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andy Black, The EMF.org. The EMF.org said: Philippe Winthrop commented on the blog post Enterprise Mobility: It's The Apps… http://goo.gl/fb/8e07W #TheEMF [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  4. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Andy Black, The EMF.org. The EMF.org said: Tony Rizzo commented on the blog post Enterprise Mobility: It's The Apps, Stupid http://goo.gl/fb/6ZeB4 #TheEMF [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

  5. [...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Mobile Data Services, The EMF.org. The EMF.org said: Custie Crampton commented on the blog post Enterprise Mobility: It's The Apps, Stupid http://goo.gl/fb/HujCj #TheEMF [...]

    Thumb up 0 Thumb down 0

Post a Comment

You must be logged in to post a comment.